Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Oliver Tarvet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Nov at 04:13 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Stebe vs O. Tarvet

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stebe 1 - 0 Tarvet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cedrik-Marcel Stebe winning 2 and Oliver Tarvet winning 0. The last match between Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Oliver Tarvet was at the Knoxville Challenger, 06-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Cedrik-Marcel Stebe getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stebe | 1 |
| Tarvet | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Knoxville Challenger(11-06-25)
C. Stebe vs O. Tarvet H2H Profile
C. Stebe vs O. Tarvet Match Preview:
- Oliver Tarvet has a slightly lower performance on second serves, winning 40.03% of points compared to Cedrik-Marcel Stebe's 43.43%.
- Both players exhibit solid return game stats, but Stebe performs better, winning 47.52% of points on second serve returns against Tarvet’s 43.96%.
- Stebe also excels in first serve returns, with a 29.27% success rate compared to Tarvet’s 25.74%.
- Under pressure, Stebe demonstrates superior breakpoint saving capability at 55.77%, while Tarvet saves 48.45%.
- Though Tarvet has a better match win percentage over the last year (73.33% vs. Stebe’s 63.89%), this factor is influenced by the level of opponents and match events.
- Tarvet's favored playing surface is Hard, with a high win rate of 79%, whereas Stebe dominates on Indoor Hard, also winning 79%.
- Tarvet has played mostly in lower-tier tournaments (Futures/Satellites), boasting a 92.86% win rate, whereas Stebe has a 54.17% win rate in higher-tier Challengers/ITF events.
- Match performance against deciding sets gives an edge to Stebe, who has won 78% of such encounters compared to Tarvet’s 57%.
- When it comes to opponent quality, both players have competing against a similar average rank, making this a less distinguishing factor.
Editorial Prediction (November 6, 2025, UTC):
The stats reveal a compelling match-up between Oliver Tarvet and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe. Although Tarvet boasts a higher annual win percentage, it’s essential to consider his victories largely stem from lower-tier events.
In contrast, Stebe, with his proficiency in both second and first serve returns and his solid performance in high-pressure situations, such as saving breakpoints, may have the upper hand in this match-up.
Moreover, his experience and success rate in Challengers/ITF could prove crucial against Tarvet. The deciding factor may be their performance in high-pressure situations, where Stebe exhibits superior stats.
Given the overall analysis, Cedrik-Marcel Stebe appears more likely to win the upcoming tennis match.
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe vs Oliver Tarvet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Stebe vs O. Tarvet H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:36:11 | Average Match Time | 1:36:11 |
| 77% (48/62) | 1st Serve % | 69% (42/61) |
| 75% (36/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (28/42) |
| 57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (10/19) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 38% (23/61) | Return Points Win % | 29% (18/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Stebe Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-0 4-0 ret. | ||
QF | W | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(6) 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
O. Tarvet Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
QF | L | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R2 | W | 5-7 6-4 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||

C. Stebe vs O. Tarvet Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.74% (362/244) | YTD Win/Loss | 75.00% (63/21) |
| 56.76% (802/611) | Sets Win/Loss | 70.21% (132/56) |
| 52.65% (7030/6323) | Games Win/Loss | 58.52% (999/708) |
| 58.90% (86/60) | Hard Win/Loss | 79.03% (49/13) |
| 60.52% (187/122) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.24% (79/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 45.45% (10/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 75.00% (6/2) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1391 | Aces Total | 288 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1312 | Total Double Faults | 168 |
| 1:14:16 | Average Match Time | 1:44:24 |
| 555.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.27 |
| 61% (20302/33118) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2748/4717) |
| 67% (13551/20302) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (1948/2748) |
| 50% (6392/12816) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (1059/1969) |
| 43% (1545/3580) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (266/532) |
| 42% (13959/33482) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2113/4895) |
| 41.18% (21/30) | Slam W/L | 80.00% (4/1) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.72% (60/56) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62.89% (200/118) | Challenger W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 68.75% (77/35) | Futures W/L | 80.60% (54/13) |
| 61% (348/571) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 77% (59/77) |
| 33% (8/24) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 55% (96/175) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 72% (13/18) |
| 61% (107/175) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (14/20) |
| 90% (331/297) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (57/53) |
| 10% (331/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (57/3) |
| 23% (275/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 37% (27/10) |